Skip to main content

Tumour Marker Use in Primary Care

In the last 5 years requests for tumour marker tests from Primary Care have more than doubled. This high use in Primary Care is worrying because the majority of tumour markers (eg. CEA, CA19-9) are neither specific nor sensitive enough for use in the diagnosis of malignancy. See this link for a summary of the main tumour markers, their uses and limitations.

The main use for tumour markers is in monitoring disease progression, treatment or recurrence of a histologically diagnosed cancer. A recent audit of Primary Care requests for tumour markers found that only 9% of CEA and 4% of CA19-9 were requested for these reasons; the rest being for non-specific symptoms.

In contrast to the above, CA125 and PSA do have use in diagnosis of their related cancers, however it should also be noted that these are still only a diagnostic aid and should be used with caution as both can be raised in a number of other benign conditions (see table). Please click the relevant links below of links to guidelines relating to their use in Primary Care.

CA125 link https://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/ovarian-cancer

PSA link https://www.gov.uk/guidance/prostate-cancer-risk-management-programme-overview

For symptoms and referral guidelines of other malignancies see the NICE Suspected Cancer Recognition and Referral guidelines. http://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/suspected-cancer-recognition-and-referral

You can also use the search bar or test database on this website to find more specific information on the use of each tumour marker.

Tumour marker

Main application

Other tumour elevations

Other limitations

CEA

Monitoring colorectal adenocarcinomas

Breast, lung, gastric, mesotheliomas, oesophageal and pancreatic

Raised in smokers

Raised in other benign renal, liver, lung or GI disease

Poor sensitivity in early disease and may be absent/low in poorly differentiated tumours

CA19-9

Monitoring pancreatic carcinoma

 

Raised in obstructive jaundice, cholestasis, cirrhosis, pancreatic hepatitis and non-malignant GI disease.

Not present in those negative for the Lewis blood group determinant.

CA125

Monitoring ovarian carcinoma

 

Raised in patients with ascites, pleural effusions or free fluid in the pelvis

Raised in patients with congestive heart failure

Raised in benign renal and liver disease and other adenocarcinomas

Mildly raised in menstruation and the first two trimesters of pregnancy

Can be raised in endometriosis

CA15-3

Monitoring breast cancer

Lung, colon, ovary

Raised in benign liver, breast, ovarian disease

AFP

Diagnosis and monitoring of hepatocellular carcinoma and germ cell tumours

Gastric and other GI (oesophageal, pancreatic)

Raised in pregnancy and neonates

Raised in benign liver disease

PSA

Diagnosis and monitoring of prostate carcinoma

 

Also elevated in benign prostatic conditions

Increases with age (as prostate size increases)

Elevated in UTI, catheterisation, prostatitis or other prostate manipulation

hCG

Diagnosis and monitoring of germ cell tumours and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

Lung

Raised in pregnancy

Transiently elevated with cannabis use

LDH

Diagnosis and monitoring of germ cell tumours

 

Elevated in cardiac disease and benign liver disease

Elevated in some anaemias relating to non-malignant disease

  • Created on .
  • Last updated on .

Notice of the change to the equation used to calculate estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) across UHB on November 22nd 2021

On 22.11.201, the formula to calculate eGFR at UHB will be changed from MDRD to CKD-EPI. This is in line with long standing NICE guidance. This is a more accurate equation to estimate GFR. This will not affect the management of patients and should not lead to a major eGFR change on an individual patient basis. As per NICE guidance, it is no longer necessary to correct for ethnicity.

Further information

At present, eGFR is calculated at UHB using the MDRD equation. This equation was based upon measurements in patients with established renal disease. It uses creatinine, sex, age, and the ethnicity of the patient to estimate the GFR.  The group that developed the MDRD equation subsequently developed the CKD-EPI equation using data from patients who had normal and impaired renal function. Like MDRD, the original CKD-EPI equation used creatinine, sex, age, and the ethnicity of the patient to estimate the GFR however recent NICE guidance has recommended that ethnicity is no longer used. CKD-EPI is thought to reflect renal function better than the MDRD equation. Compared to measured GFR, performance of the two equations are similar when GFR is < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 with the MDRD equation underestimating GFR at levels > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 when compared to the CKD-EPI equation. It is thought that the impact on patient management will be minimal however there is a possibility that CKD classifications could change due to CKD-EPI more closely reflecting the ‘true’ GFR. NICE has recommended using the CKD-EPI equation to calculate eGFR since 2014 with ethnicity removal outlined this year.

There is no change to specimen requirements or test requesting.

For clinical queries relating to this change please contact Professor Paul Cockwell (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.). For laboratory queries please contact Dr Alex Lawson (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.).

References

Chronic kidney disease: assessment and management. NICE guideline [NG203]

https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng203/resources/chronic-kidney-disease-assessment-and-management-pdf-66143713055173

UK Kidney Association The rationale for removing adjustment for ethnicity from eGFRcreatinine and recommendations for implementation of the change in practice

https://ukkidney.org/sites/renal.org/files/guidelines/Rationale_and_recommendations_for_implementation_NICE%20CKD%20Guideline%202021.pdf

Original CKD-EPI Paper – Comparison of MDRD and CKD-EPI

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2763564/pdf/nihms132246.pdf

  • Created on .
  • Last updated on .